November 18, 2004

Blog has been moved

This post has been moved to blogspot. No further posts will be made to this location.

Internet hunting

Just when you think that we are going to kill ourselves so we look good to voters, you see why this may not be such a loss. *sigh* What's with people's need to kill things in newer and "better" ways?

Posted by jim at November 18, 2004 10:17 AM
Comments

"We were looking at a beautiful white-tail buck and my friend said 'If you just had a gun for that.' A little light bulb went off in my head," he said.

WTF!

Posted by: Heather at November 18, 2004 12:00 PM

The first story is just scary. I think I told you about it yesterday, and you know my opinion about Putin: former KGB, surgically removed conscience, just scary person. Now he has a finger on the deadliest trigger on the planet. Makes me feel very safe and comfortable here in western hemisphere.

The second story is just sick. Getting out in the woods and hunting for food is one thing, but killing an animal just because you think it's super fun is simply disgusting:
"We were looking at a beautiful white-tail buck and my friend said 'If you just had a gun for that.' A little light bulb went off in my head," he said.
Ooh, such a cute story. They saw a deer and the first thought was “Kill it!”. Also, a little light bulb went off in his head. Ooh, how cute, we are witnessing a birth of a genius.

Posted by: Aleks at November 18, 2004 12:09 PM

Putin and The Inventor should team up and make a nuclear missile that anyone could fire at any country in the world. This way everyone wins.

Posted by: Aleks at November 18, 2004 12:14 PM

Ya, it really makes me wonder... I understand hunting for food, but just so you can kill something? I just don't get it.

Sorry for stealing your story Aleks... I wasn't going to post it, but I felt like it just went along with the second one.

Posted by: Jim at November 18, 2004 12:15 PM

"Hunters soon may be able to sit at their computers and blast away at animals on a Texas ranch via the Internet".

"He said an attendant would retrieve shot animals for the shooters".

A little light bulb went off in my head, too. Can we shoot a pig, and then while the attendant retrieves the pig, we shoot at the attendant?

Oh, another little light bulb went off in my head. This ranch is in Texas, right? Is it anywhere near the Bush ranch? How well can we zoom in with this webcamera?

(Of course, Bush is a moron, but i am just joking! All you Secret Service nut jobs playing on the Internet can take it easy. Your chief will live to kill another day.)

Posted by: Cooter at November 18, 2004 02:51 PM

Maybe this could arrange it so that, for an extra fee, they'd send you the meat of the animal you shot. This would make it a lot more appealing, especially to those who don't want animals killed just for the sake of killing them. On the other hand, If i was the guy with the ranch, I would sell the meat to someone. No point in all that meat going to waste.

Posted by: Kibbee at November 19, 2004 10:31 AM

Get out of the Paleozoic era you backward-ass Texan. There is a thing called a grocery store where you can get your meat. It's people like you that disgrace the human race.

Posted by: dd at February 13, 2005 09:59 PM

What is it with killing animals for sport??? Anyone ever heard of laser quest??? No one gets hurt or worse killed...

Posted by: cucumber1960 at May 10, 2005 10:45 AM
Due to the proliferation of comment spam, I’ve had to close comments on this entry. If you would like to leave comment, please use one of my recent entries. Thank you and sorry for any inconvience caused.